4.7 Article

High-Performance Gel Polymer Electrolyte with Self-Healing Capability for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 5267-5276

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c00713

Keywords

Supramolecular polymers; Cross-linked network; Gel polymer electrolyte; Self-healing; Lithium-ion battery

Funding

  1. Key Project of Strategic New Indust ry of Hunan Province [2019GK2032]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) with good flexibility, high mechanical strength, high ionic conductivity, and self-repairing capability has been proposed. It also exhibits excellent interfacial stability with the electrode, making it suitable for high-performance lithium-ion batteries.
Polymer electrolytes (PEs) are predicted to be an alternative to liquid electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) since they can overcome the problems of leakage and electrolyte flammability issues. However, polymer electrolytes often suffer from disappointing cracks or breakage, which will lead to short circuits and bring some safety issues. Furthermore, the undesirable ionic conductivity at room temperature also limits their practical application. Here, a novel gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) was proposed. The cross-linking network was formed by adding supramolecular copolymer PEG-UPy to the cross-linking matrix of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and polyvinylidene fluoride hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP), and the resulting GPE has the advantages of good flexibility, high mechanical strength, high ionic conductivity (7.5 x 10(-4) S cm(-1), RT) and can be self-repaired without external stimulation. In addition, the GPE exhibits good interfacial stability with the electrode, which can be used in high-performance lithium-ion batteries with stable reversible electrochemical reactions and excellent cycling stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available