4.6 Article

Three New Species of Hypoxylon (Xylariales, Ascomycota) on a Multigene Phylogeny from Medog in Southwest China

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof8050500

Keywords

Ascomycota; Hypoxylon; multigene phylogeny; taxonomy; wood-decomposing fungi; Xylariales

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972848, 31770023]
  2. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences [1630032022001, 1630052022003, 1630052022042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three new species of hypoxylaceous fungi were discovered in Medog county, China, through morphological and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses. A key to all known Hypoxylon species from China and related species worldwide is provided.
During a survey of hypoxylaceous fungi in Medog county (Tibet Autonomous Region, China), three new species, including Hypoxylon damuense, Hypoxylon medogense, and Hypoxylon zangii, were described and illustrated based on morphological and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses. Hypoxylon damuense is characterized by its yellow-brown stromatal granules, light-brown to brown ascospores, and frequently indehiscent perispore. Hypoxylon medogense is morphologically and phylogenetically related to H. erythrostroma but differs in having larger ascospores with straight spore-length germ slit and conspicuously coil-like perispore ornamentation. Hypoxylon zangii shows morphological similarities to H. texense but differs in having Amber (47), Fulvous (43) and Sienna (8) KOH-extractable pigments and larger ascospores with straight spore-length germ slit. The multi-gene phylogenetic analyses inferred from the datasets of ITS-RPB2-LSU-TUB2 supported the three new taxa as separate lineages within Hypoxylon. A key to all known Hypoxylon species from China and related species worldwide is provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available