4.7 Article

Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Among Asian Women

Journal

JAMA NETWORK OPEN
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.49030

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA235553, R01CA124558, R01CA158473, R01CA148667]
  2. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center [P30CA068485]
  3. Basic Research Laboratory program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2011-0001564, 2012-0000347]
  4. National Research & Development Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health, Welfare, and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [1020350]
  5. National Cancer Center of Korea [1410690, 1710170]
  6. Shanghai Breast Cancer Study [R01CA064277]
  7. ShanghaiWomen's Health Study [R37CA070867, UM1CA182910]
  8. Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study [R01CA118229]
  9. Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Study [R01CA092585]
  10. Seoul Breast Cancer Study
  11. BioBank Japan Project (principal investigator, Michiaki Kubo
  12. the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sciences and Technology from the Japanese Government)
  13. Hwasun Cancer Epidemiology Study-Breast
  14. Biobank of Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital [07SA2014020]
  15. Breast Cancer Association Consortium - Cancer Research UK [C1287/A16563]
  16. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [223175 [HEALTH-F2-2009-223175] COGS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the researchers found that polygenic risk scores derived from breast cancer risk-associated single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) had similar predictive performance in Asian and European women. Including non-genetic risk factors in the models further improved prediction accuracy. These findings support the utility of these models in developing personalized screening and prevention strategies.
IMPORTANCE Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have shown promise in breast cancer risk prediction; however, limited studies have been conducted among Asian women. OBJECTIVE To develop breast cancer risk prediction models for Asian women incorporating PRSs and nongenetic risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This diagnostic study included women of Asian ancestry from the Asia Breast Cancer Consortium. PRSs were developed using data from genomewide association studies (GWASs) of breast cancer conducted among 123 041 women with Asian ancestry (including 18 650women with breast cancer) using 3 approaches: (1) reported PRS forwomen with European ancestry; (2) breast cancer-associated single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) identified by fine-mapping of GWAS-identified risk loci; and (3) genomewide risk prediction algorithms. A nongenetic risk score (NGRS) was built, including 7 well-established nongenetic risk factors, using data of 416 case participants and 1558 control participants from a prospective cohort study. PRSs were initially validated in an independent data set including 1426 case participants and 1323 control participants and further evaluated, along with the NGRS, in the second data set including 368 case participants and 736 control participants nested within a prospective cohort study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Logistic regression was used to examine associations of risk scores with breast cancer risk to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS A total of 126 894 women of Asian ancestry were included; 20 444 (16.1%) had breast cancer. The mean (SD) age ranged from 49.1 (10.8) to 54.4 (10.4) years for case participants and 50.6 (9.5) to 54.0 (7.4) years for control participants among studies that provided demographic characteristics. In the prospective cohort, a PRS with 111 SNVs developed using the fine-mapping approach (PRS111) showed a prediction performance comparable with a genomewide PRS that included more than 855 000 SNVs. The OR per SD increase of PRS111 score was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.46-1.92), with an AUC of 0.639 (95% CI, 0.604-0.674). The NGRS had a limited predictive ability (AUC, 0.565; 95% CI, 0.529-0.601). Compared with the average risk group (40th-60th percentile), women in the top 5% of PRS111 and NGRS were at a 3.84-fold (95% CI, 2.30-6.46) and 2.10-fold (95% CI, 1.22-3.62) higher risk of breast cancer, respectively. The prediction model including both PRS111 and NGRS achieved the highest prediction accuracy (AUC, 0.648; 95% CI, 0.613-0.682). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, PRSs derived using breast cancer risk-associated SNVs had similar predictive performance in Asian and European women. Including nongenetic risk factors in models further improved prediction accuracy. These findings support the utility of these models in developing personalized screening and prevention strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available