4.5 Article

Variability in marsh migration potential determined by topographic rather than anthropogenic constraints in the Chesapeake Bay region

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 321-331

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lol2.10262

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey Climate Research and Development
  2. U.S. Geological Survey Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program
  3. National Science Foundation [EAR-1654374, DEB-1832221, EAR-2012670]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sea level rise and saltwater intrusion are causing shifts in coastal ecosystems, and a study on Chesapeake Bay predicts the formation of marshes at the expense of forested wetlands by 2100. The predicted marsh migration exceeds historical observations and is concentrated in a few watersheds. Despite regional marsh maintenance, replacement of local ecosystem services in vulnerable watersheds remains uncertain.
Sea level rise (SLR) and saltwater intrusion are driving inland shifts in coastal ecosystems. Here, we make high-resolution (1 m) predictions of land conversion under future SLR scenarios in 81 watersheds surrounding Chesapeake Bay, United States, a hotspot for accelerated SLR and saltwater intrusion. We find that 1050-3748 km(2) of marsh could be created by 2100, largely at the expense of forested wetlands. Predicted marsh migration exceeds total current tidal marsh area and is similar to 4x greater than historical observations. Anthropogenic land use in marsh migration areas is concentrated within a few watersheds and minimally impacts calculated metrics of marsh resilience. Despite regional marsh area maintenance, local ecosystem service replacement within vulnerable watersheds remains uncertain. However, our work suggests that topography rather than land use drives spatial variability in wetland vulnerability regionally, and that rural land conversion is needed to compensate for extensive areal losses on heavily developed coasts globally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available