4.7 Article

Changes in temporal inequality of precipitation extremes over China due to anthropogenic forcings

Journal

NPJ CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41612-022-00255-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42130512, 41888101, 42122004]
  2. Program for High-Level Talents Introduction in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [Y941181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used Gini-coefficients to analyze the impact of anthropogenic forcing on the temporal inequality of precipitation in China. The results show a positive influence of anthropogenic activities on precipitation extremes, especially in southern regions. Projections indicate an upward trend in temporal precipitation variability under different scenarios. The findings provide insights for managing water-related disasters.
Based on the Gini-coefficients, this study has presented an analysis of the impacts of anthropogenic forcing on the temporal inequality (i.e., increase in unevenness or disparity) of precipitation amounts (PRCPTOT), intensity (SDII), and extremes (R95p and RX5day) at national and regional scales (eight regions) in China. A positive anthropogenic influence on the temporal inequality is found for precipitation extremes over China, especially in southern regions during the period 1961-2005. Projections of future precipitation indices except R95p have a stepped upward trend in temporal precipitation variability with increasing anthropogenic forcing in most regions of China under SSP126, SSP370, and SSP585 scenarios. Except for Southern China (SC) and SWC2, R95p has a significant decrease in the future, and the largest decrease is up to 29.5% in Northwest China under SSP370. Results obtained from this study offer insights into temporal variability of precipitation extremes and help policy makers for managing water-related disasters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available