4.6 Review

Direct borohydride fuel cells: A selected review of their reaction mechanisms, electrocatalysts, and influence of operating parameters on their performance

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100883

Keywords

Borohydride oxidation reaction; Direct borohydride fuel cells; Platinum; Nickel; Palladium

Funding

  1. National Research Agency [ANR-1-CE05-0017]
  2. Centre of Excellence of Multifunctional Architectured Materials CEMAM [ANR-10-LABX-44-01]
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the governmental order for Boreskov lnstitute of Catalysis [AAAA-A21-121011390006-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct borohydride fuel cells face challenges in achieving high efficiency, including the selection of suitable catalysts, optimization of reaction conditions, and the choice of appropriate membrane materials.
Direct borohydride fuel cells (DBFC) oxidize an easily-stored energy-dense borohydride fuel (sodium borohydride: NaBH4), that in theory reacts ca. 400 mV below H2 and produces 8 electrons per BH4- anion. However, the borohydride oxidation reaction (BOR) does not fully meet these promises in practice: the electrocatalyst nature, structure and state-of-surface, and the operating conditions (pH, BH4- concentration, temperature, fluxes) noticeably influence the BOR kinetics and mechanism. Nickel and platinum-based catalysts both have assets for the BOR. DBFCs can only yield decent performance if their separator combines high ion-conductivity and efficient separation of the reactants; cation-exchange membranes, anionexchange membranes, bipolar membranes and porous separators all have their own advantages and drawbacks. Besides the anode, the choice of separator must consider the DBFC cathode reaction, where oxygen (usually from air) or hydrogen peroxide are reduced, provided adapted catalysts are used. All these aspects drive the DBFC performance and stability/ durability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available