4.0 Article

Evaluation of surgical treatment of genital prolapse using synthetic mesh in an outpatient procedure and patient satisfaction

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102312

Keywords

Ambulatory; Genital prolapse; Vaginal mesh; Patient satisfaction; Ambulatory; Genital prolapse; Vaginal mesh; Patient satisfaction

Funding

  1. Boston Scientific [ISR URO_00041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to investigate a new strategy for one day prolapse surgery with mesh and identify risk factors for procedure failure and patient satisfaction. The results demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of prosthetic prolapse surgery during outpatient hospitalization, with anesthetic management being a significant factor for surgery success and patient satisfaction.
Objective: To study a new strategy for one day prolapse surgery with mesh, to identify risk factors for one day procedure failure and patient satisfaction. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at Saint Etienne University Hospital, France. All patients who received a prolapse treatment by synthetic mesh between January 2016 and April 2019 in one day surgery procedure were included in the study. Exhaustive variables was collected and all patients were contacted for a satisfaction survey. Results: During the periode patients were included. 6 of them required readmissions included 5 hospitalization for urinary retention and 1 for abnormal bleeding. Among the patients, 87% were satisfied. Only the anesthetic management was significantly associated with an ambulatory surgery success (p = 0,02) and satisfaction (p = 0,001). Conclusion: This study shows the technical feasibility and safety of prosthetic prolapse surgery during outpatient hospitalization. The success of a rapid pathway in one day surgery depends on a good selection of patients, proper planning of surgical procedures and optimization of anesthesia protocols. The prevention of outpatient failures is justified for medical and economic reasons respecting the quality and safety of patients.(c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available