4.7 Article

Second-Order Spatial-Temporal Correlation Filters for Visual Tracking

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10050684

Keywords

correlation filters; second-order fitting; visual tracking

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR [0119/2018/A3]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62006056]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515011266]
  4. National Statistical Science Research Project of China [2020LY090]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [202102020699]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Discriminative correlation filters (DCFs) have been widely used in visual object tracking. This paper proposes a second-order spatial-temporal correlation filter (SSCF) learning model to address the limitations of DCFs. Experimental results demonstrate that SSCF achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art trackers.
Discriminative correlation filters (DCFs) have been widely used in visual object tracking, but often suffer from two problems: the boundary effect and temporal filtering degradation. To deal with these issues, many DCF-based variants have been proposed and have improved the accuracy of visual object tracking. However, these trackers only adopt first-order data-fitting information and have difficulty maintaining robust tracking in unconstrained scenarios, especially in the case of complex appearance variations. In this paper, by introducing a second-order data-fitting term to the DCF, we propose a second-order spatial-temporal correlation filter (SSCF) learning model. To be specific, the SSCF tracker both incorporates the first-order and second-order data-fitting terms into the DCF framework and makes the learned correlation filter more discriminative. Meanwhile, the spatial-temporal regularization was integrated to develop a robust model in tracking with complex appearance variations. Extensive experiments were conducted on the benchmarking databases CVPR2013, OTB100, DTB70, UAV123, and UAVDT-M. The results demonstrated that our SSCF can achieve competitive performance compared to the state-of-the-art trackers. When penalty parameter lambda was set to 10-5, our SSCF gained DP scores of 0.882, 0.868, 0.706, 0.676, and 0.928 on the CVPR2013, OTB100, DTB70, UAV123, and UAVDT-M databases, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available