4.7 Article

The Due Window Assignment Problems with Deteriorating Job and Delivery Time

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10101672

Keywords

scheduling; due window; deteriorating job; delivery time; earliness; tardiness

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2105021, N2105020]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province Project [2021-MS-102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the scheduling problem for a single machine, taking into account due window, delivery time, and deteriorating jobs. The objective is to minimize the window location, window size, earliness, and tardiness. Both common due window and slack due window are considered. The delivery time depends on the actual processing time of previous sequences, which is an increasing function of the start time. By utilizing small perturbations and adjacent exchange techniques, propositions for the problems are obtained. Polynomial time solvability in O(nlogn) time is proven for both common and slack due window assignment. The paper also proposes algorithms to obtain the optimal sequence, window location, and window size.
This paper considers the single machine scheduling problem with due window, delivery time and deteriorating job, whose goal is to minimize the window location, window size, earliness and tardiness. Common due window and slack due window are considered. The delivery time depends on the actual processing time of past sequences. The actual processing time of the job is an increasing function of the start time. Based on the small perturbations technique and adjacent exchange technique, we obtain the propositions of the problems. For common and slack due window assignment, we prove that the two objective functions are polynomial time solvable in O(nlogn) time. We propose the corresponding algorithms to obtain the optimal sequence, window location and window size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available