4.6 Review

Design Concept for a Future Super Proton-Proton Collider

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.828878

Keywords

proton-proton collider; physics beyond standard model; center-of-mass energy; luminosity; iron-based superconducting magnets

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11575214, 12035017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following the discovery of the Higgs boson, the international high-energy community is considering and studying new large colliders, with the CEPC-SPPC project in China being one of the important research initiatives. Consisting of two stages, the project focuses on studying Higgs physics in the first stage and aims to become an energy frontier collider beyond the LHC in the second stage. This article presents the design concept of the SPPC and discusses key accelerator physics problems and technical issues.
Following the discovery of the Higgs boson at the LHC in 2012, new large colliders are being considered and studied by the international high-energy community to explore the Higgs boson in details and to probe new physics beyond the Standard Model. In China, a two-stage circular collider project, CEPC-SPPC was proposed and is under study. The first stage, CEPC (Circular Electron Positron Collier, a so-called Higgs factory) is focused on the Higgs physics, and the second stage, SPPC (Super Proton-Proton Collider) will be an energy frontier collider and a discovery machine beyond the LHC. The two colliders will share a same tunnel of 100 km in circumference, with a goal of 250 GeV in center-of-mass for CEPC and 75 TeV for SPPC Phase-I and 125-150 TeV for the SPPC ultimate goal. This article presents the design concept of the SPPC and some study results about the key accelerator physics problems and technical issues, which include luminosity optimization, beam collimation, beam-beam effects, longitudinal beam dynamics, high-field magnets and beam screen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available