4.7 Article

In vitro Dissolution Testing and Pharmacokinetic Studies of Silymarin Solid Dispersion After Oral Administration to Healthy Pigs

Journal

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.815198

Keywords

silymarin; solid dispersion; dissolution; pharmacokinetic; pigs

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0501306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of silymarin solid dispersion in pigs and found that the bioavailability of silybin was significantly increased compared to a silymarin premix.
We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of silymarin solid dispersion in pigs to determine whether silybin bioavailability would be increased over that of a silymarin premix. In vitro dissolution testing was conducted using dissolution apparatus 1 (baskets) at 100 rpm at 37 +/- 0.5 degrees C in pH 1.2 HCl, pH 6.8 phosphate, and pH 4.3 acetate buffers containing 0.5% Tween-80. In vivo pharmacokinetics were studied using 16 healthy pigs (Yorkshire x Landrace) that were randomly assigned to two groups. Silymarin as solid dispersion and premix dosage forms were administered directly by stomach tubes at 50 mg kg(-1) silybin. In vitro dissolution of silybin for the premix was 35.02, 35.90, and 38.70% in these buffers, respectively. In contrast, silybin dissolution in solid dispersions was increased to 82.92, 87.48, and 99.70%, respectively. Silymarin solid dispersion administered at a single dose resulted in a peak concentration (C-max) of 1,190.02 +/- 246.97 ng ml(-1) with the area under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)) at 1,299.19 +/- 67.61 ng ml(-1) h. These parameters for the premix groups were 411.35 +/- 84.92 ng ml(-1) and 586.82 +/- 180.99 ng ml(-1) h, respectively. The C-max and AUC(0-infinity) values for the solid dispersion were about twice that of the premix and were consistent with the in vitro dissolution data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available