4.7 Article

Prevalence and Determinants of Mobile Health Applications Usage: A National Descriptive Study

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.838509

Keywords

mobile health application; e-health; Saudi Arabia; heath care applications; public health policy (PHP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of mobile health app (MHA) usage among inhabitants in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of MHA usage was found to be 47.9%, with higher usage among younger, Saudi, highly educated, and working individuals, as well as those with chronic diseases. The main motives for using MHAs were to improve health status and lose weight, and the most commonly used apps were related to daily steps-counting and tracking ovulation period.
We aimed to determine the prevalence of MHAs' usage and explore the context and determinants of using MHAs among inhabitants in Saudi Arabia (SA). This cross-sectional study randomly selected 679 adult inhabitants from the 20 health regions in SA through an electronic, self-administered, well-structured, and validated Arabic questionnaire. The prevalence of using MHAs was 47.9%, and it was significantly higher among younger, Saudis, highly educated, and working participants, as well as those with chronic diseases (p < 0.05). The main motives for using MHAs were to promote health status (68.6%) and to lose weight (33.2%). The most used apps were related to daily steps-counting (54.2%), and among females was tracking ovulation period apps (43.5%). The most common reported advantage of using MHAs was saving time (64%). Despite the potential benefits of MHAs, they were used by only about half of the study participants in SA. The most effective MHAs in improving health status were exercise, calorie-related, water uptake, and daily steps-counting apps. Policymakers looking to address reform aimed at improving health with mobile apps will find our study interesting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available