4.5 Article

Factors of Detection Deficits in Vascular Plant Inventories-An Island Case Study

Journal

DIVERSITY-BASEL
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d14040303

Keywords

Aegean flora; floristic survey; Mediterranean island; perceptibility; habitat; plant traits; rarity

Funding

  1. MAVA
  2. Fondation pour la Nature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The completeness of large-scale floristic inventories can be challenging to determine. A comparison was made between previous vascular plant species inventories of Limnos island in Greece and recent records from 2016-2021. It was found that certain plant families and traits were overrepresented in the dataset of newly discovered taxa, indicating biases in ecological and perceptibility factors.
The degree of completeness of large-scale floristic inventories is often difficult to judge. We compared prior vascular plant species inventories of the Mediterranean island of Limnos (North Aegean, Greece) with 231 recent records from 2016-2021. Together with the recent records, the known number of vascular plant species on the island is 960 native taxa, 63 established neophytes, and 27 species of as yet casual status for a total of 1050 taxa. We looked at a number of traits (plant family, size, flower color, perceptibility, habitat, reproduction period, rarity, and status) to investigate whether they were overrepresented in the dataset of the newly found taxa. Overrepresentation was found in some plant families (e.g., Poaceae and Chenopodiaceae) and for traits such as hydrophytic life form, unobtrusive flower color, coastal as well as agricultural and ruderal habitats, and late (summer/autumn) reproduction period. Apart from the well-known fact of esthetic bias, we found evidence for ecological and perceptibility biases. Plant species inventories based on prior piecemeal collated data should focus on regionally specific species groups and underrepresented and rare habitats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available