4.7 Article

Electrical resistivity of plain cement-based materials based on ionic conductivity: A review of applications and conductive models

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103642

Keywords

Electrical resistivity; Test methods; Application; Multi-phase conductive models; Influence factors

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52178197]
  3. [GX18A025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the application of resistivity in cement-based materials, including hydration, compressive strength, and ions diffusion. It also focuses on the evolution history, strengths/weaknesses, and prediction accuracy of multi-phase conductive models. The analysis results show the importance of considering the changing model parameters with pore structure. Future works can be done in testing methods, raw materials, testing environments, and conductive models.
As a non-destructive testing technology, the resistivity method can respond quickly to the microstructure and macro-performance of cement-based materials(CBMs). This paper reviews the resistivity test methods as well as the application of resistivity in hydration, compressive strength and ions diffusion. Besides, in order to capture the evolution of the pore structure by resistivity, the multi-phase conductive models are also systematically reviewed. Emphasis is placed on the evolution history, strength/weakness, and prediction accuracy of these models. The precision analysis results show that the process of model parameters changing with the pore structure cannot be ignored. A conductive model with constant model parameters can only evaluate porosity in the short term but fails to estimate the porosity during the whole service life of CBMs. Future works on the testing methods, raw materials, testing environments and conductive models are indicated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available