4.6 Article

Characterization of Dysfunctional Lens Index and Opacity Grade in a Healthy Population

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051167

Keywords

dysfunctional lens syndrome; cataract; dysfunctional lens index; high-order aberrations

Funding

  1. European Union-NextGenerationEU
  2. Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness of Spain within the program Ramon y Cajal [RYC-2016-20471]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the Dysfunctional Lens Index (DLI) is correlated with age and pupil diameter, and may be used as a complementary diagnostic measurement for assessing dysfunctional lens syndrome.
This study enrolled 61 volunteers (102 eyes) classified into subjects < 50 years (group 1) and subjects >= 50 years (group 2). Dysfunctional Lens Index (DLI); opacity grade; pupil diameter; and corneal, internal, and ocular higher order aberrations (HOAs) were measured with the i-Trace system (Tracey Technologies). Mean DLI was 8.89 +/- 2.00 and 6.71 +/- 2.97 in groups 1 and 2, respectively, being significantly higher in group 1 in all and right eyes (both p < 0.001). DLI correlated significantly with age (Rho = -0.41, p < 0.001) and pupil diameter (Rho = 0.20, p = 0.043) for all eyes, and numerous internal and ocular root-mean square HOAs for right, left, and all eyes (Rho <= -0.25, p <= 0.001). Mean opacity grade was 1.21 +/- 0.63 and 1.48 +/- 1.15 in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with no significant differences between groups (p >= 0.29). Opacity grade significantly correlated with pupil diameter for right and all eyes (Rho <= 0.33, p <= 0.013), and with some ocular root-mean square HOAs for right and all eyes (Rho >= 0.23, p <= 0.020). DLI correlates with age and might be used complementary to other diagnostic measurements for assessing the dysfunctional lens syndrome. Both DLI and opacity grade maintain a relationship with pupil diameter and internal and ocular HOAs, supporting that the algorithms used by the device may be based, in part, on these parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available