4.6 Article

Evaluation of Zeolite Acidity by 31P MAS NMR Spectroscopy of Adsorbed Phosphine Oxides: Quantitative or Not?

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 7, Issue 14, Pages 12318-12328

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00804

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-73-10160]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-73-10160] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P-31 MAS NMR spectroscopy has made significant progress in the study of alkyl-substituted phosphine oxides adsorption, providing a quantitative measurement of zeolite acidity. The use of different probe molecules allows for the distinction between active sites in different locations.
P-31 magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) spectroscopy of adsorbed alkyl-substituted phosphine oxides has witnessed tremendous progress during the last years and has become one of the most informative and sensitive methods of zeolite acidity investigation. However, quantitative evaluation of the number of sites is still a challenge. This study clarifies the main origin of errors occurring during NMR experiments, introduces the appropriate standards (both internal and external), and determines the relaxation parameters and the conditions for the acquisition and integration of spectra. As a result, a methodology for the quantitative measurement of the content of Bronsted and Lewis sites and the amount of internal and external silanol groups is established. The application of probe molecules of different sizes (namely, trimethylphosphine oxide (TMPO), tri-n-butylphosphine oxide (TBPO), and tri-n-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO)) is shown to be a good tool for distinguishing between the active sites inside the zeolite pores, mesopores, and on the outer crystal surface. The methodology proposed is verified on BEA zeolites different in composition, texture, and morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available