4.6 Article

Normalizing the Optical Signal Enables Robust Assays with Lateral Flow Biosensors

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 7, Issue 21, Pages 17723-17731

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00793

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH (Korea) [R21DA049577, R01CA229777, R01CA239078, R01CA237500, R21CA267222, DOD-W81XWH1910194, U01CA233360, NRF-2017M3A9D8029943]
  2. MGH Scholar Fund
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE) in Korea [P0008746]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes a method that transforms ubiquitous smartphones into robust lateral flow assay readers by utilizing optical calibration. The method corrects shape distortion, illumination brightness, and color imbalances through image processing, enabling consistent optical signals for quantitative molecular analysis under different illumination conditions.
Lateral flow assays (LFAs) are widely adopted for fast, on-site molecular diagnostics. Obtaining high-precision assay results, however, remains challenging and often requires a dedicated optical setup to control the imaging environment. Here, we describe quick light normalization exam (qLiNE) that transforms ubiquitous smartphones into a robust LFA reader. qLiNE used a reference card, printed with geometric patterns and color standards, for real-time optical calibration: a photo of an LFA test strip was taken along with the card, and the image was processed using a smartphone app to correct shape distortion, illumination brightness, and color imbalances. This approach yielded consistent optical signal, enabling quantitative molecular analyses under different illumination conditions. We adapted qLiNE to detect cortisol, a known stress hormone, in saliva samples at point-of-use settings. The assay was fast (15 min) and sensitive (detection limit, 0.16 ng/mL). The serial qLiNE assay detected diurnal cycles of cortisol levels as well as stress-induced cortisol increase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available