4.6 Review

The Essential Role of Wetland Restoration Practitioners in the Science-Policy-Practice Process

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.838502

Keywords

wetland; restoration; policy maker; scientist; practitioner; living laboratory; lessons

Categories

Funding

  1. Alberta Land Institute, Alberta Environment and Parks through the Watershed Resiliency and Restoration Program, Alberta Innovates-Bio Solutions [Bio-14-010]
  2. NSERC Discovery Grant [06579-2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a living laboratory research in the prairie pothole landscape in Alberta, Canada, to demonstrate the use of new scientific tools and policy instruments for wetland restoration. Despite the strength in science and policy, the implementation of the restoration program was stalled due to various barriers, limiting the participation of landowners and resulting in a small number of wetlands being restored. The study highlights the importance of understanding the practice realm and engaging practitioners in wetland restoration activities.
We conducted a living laboratory study using a holistic transdisciplinary approach to demonstrate how new scientific tools and policy instruments could be mobilized to achieve wetland restoration goals. Our living laboratory was situated on the prairie pothole landscape in the province of Alberta, Canada, where policies require the replacement of lost wetland habitat. We created tools to map ditch-drained wetlands and to measure their functions in terms of hydrological health, water quality improvement, and ecological health to optimize targeting of wetland restoration sites. We also tested new policy instruments to incentivize private landowners to restore ditch-drained wetlands. However, we arguably failed in the implementation of the restoration program due to barriers that severely limited landowner participation, resulting in only a small number of wetlands being restored. Despite strength in science and a profound understanding of the policy, on-the-ground restoration work was stalled due to the interactive effects of environmental, social, economic, and political barriers. We discovered that despite our focus on overcoming the science-policy gap, it is the practice realm that requires more attention from both scientists and policy makers engaged in wetland restoration activities. Generally, the tools we developed were irrelevant because of complex interactions between actors and barriers within the policy, governance, and site-specific contexts that limited the use and application of the tools. Our living laboratory highlights the risks of engaging in use-inspired research without having a clear understanding of the actors and the interacting contexts that influence their behavior, motivations, and risk tolerance. Informed by our experiences, we offer key considerations for better engagement of practitioners in the design and implementation of wetland restoration programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available