4.7 Article

Impact of Different Oak Chips' Aging on the Volatile Compounds and Sensory Characteristics of Vitis amurensis Wines

Journal

FOODS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11081126

Keywords

Vitis amurensis wine; oak chips; aging; sensory characteristics

Funding

  1. Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Liaoning Province [2020-BS-123]
  2. scientific research project of the EducationDepartment of Liaoning Province [2019LQN09, 2019LQN08]
  3. Liao Ning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1902040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that adding different oak chips can improve the color and sensory properties of Vitis amurensis wine. The concentration of volatile compounds is influenced by different oak species and toasting levels.
In this work, different oak chips were used to age Vitis amurensis wine, and the effects on sensory properties were observed. Twenty-one different oak chips were added to a one-year-old wine made by a traditional technique. The wine was aged for 6 months before analysis by CIELab for color parameters, GC-MS for volatile compounds, and electronic tongue and a tasting panel for sensory properties. The results showed that the addition of any tested oak chip could significantly strengthen the wine's red color. Among 61 volatile compounds, alcohols presented the highest concentrations (873 to 1401 mg/L), followed by esters (568 to 1039 mg/L) and organic acids (157 to 435 mg/L), while aldehydes and volatile phenols occurred at low concentrations. Different oak species with different toasting levels could affect, to varying degrees, the concentrations of esters, alcohols, and volatile phenols, but to a lesser extent those of aldehydes. Sensory analysis by a tasting panel indicated that non- and moderately roasted oak chips gave the wines higher scores than those with heavy toasting levels. The major mouthfeel descriptors determined by electronic tongue were in good agreement with those from the tasting panel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available