4.7 Review

Towards the Development of 3D-Printed Food: A Rheological and Mechanical Approach

Journal

FOODS
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11091191

Keywords

3D food printing; rheological properties; mechanical properties; additive manufacturing

Funding

  1. L'Oreal-UNESCO-AMC ForWomen in Science 2020 Scholarship and Tecnologico de Monterrey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, has gained interest in the food industry for personalized nutrition and customized products. The rheological properties of the materials are crucial for the 3D-printing process, while the mechanical properties are related to the texture of the food products. Thorough characterization of the manufacturing parameters is necessary prior to consuming any 3D-printed food.
Additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, has raised interest in many areas, such as the food industry. In food, 3D printing can be used to personalize nutrition and customize the sensorial characteristics of the final product. The rheological properties of the material are the main parameters that impact the 3D-printing process and are crucial to assuring the printability of formulations, although a clear relationship between these properties and printability has not been studied in depth. In addition, an understanding of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed food is crucial for consumer satisfaction, as they are related to the texture of food products. In 3D-printing technologies, each manufacturing parameter has an impact on the resulting mechanical properties; therefore, a thorough characterization of these parameters is necessary prior to the consumption of any 3D-printed food. This review focuses on the rheological and mechanical properties of printed food materials by exploring cutting-edge research working towards developing printed food for personalized nutrition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available