4.7 Article

Starch-Rich Microalgae as an Active Ingredient in Beer Brewing

Journal

FOODS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11101449

Keywords

Tetraselmis; microalgae; brewing; food; beverage; starch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microalgal biomass, cultivated under nitrogen deprivation to produce 50% starch-containing Tetraselmis chui, was explored as an active ingredient in beer brewing through small-scale trials. Successfully integrated into the brewing process, T. chui enriched beer with microalgae, resulting in a product with distinct sensory properties.
Microalgal biomass is widely studied for its possible application in food and human nutrition due to its multiple potential health benefits, and to address raising sustainability concerns. An interesting field whereby to further explore the application of microalgae is that of beer brewing, due to the capacity of some species to accumulate large amounts of starch under specific growth conditions. The marine species Tetraselmis chui is a well-known starch producer, and was selected in this study for the production of biomass to be explored as an active ingredient in beer brewing. Cultivation was performed under nitrogen deprivation in 250 L tubular photobioreactors, producing a biomass containing 50% starch. The properties of high-starch microalgal biomass in a traditional mashing process were then assessed to identify critical steps and challenges, test the efficiency of fermentable sugar release, and develop a protocol for small-scale brewing trials. Finally, T. chui was successfully integrated at a small scale into the brewing process as an active ingredient, producing microalgae-enriched beer containing up to 20% algal biomass. The addition of microalgae had a noticeable effect on the beer properties, resulting in a product with distinct sensory properties. Regulation of pH proved to be a key parameter in the process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available