4.7 Article

Caloric and Lipid Profiles in the Spanish Population of North Africa

Journal

FOODS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11081140

Keywords

culture; eating habits; sugar; caloric profile; lipid profile; diet quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to promote healthier eating habits and prevent the development of diabetes mellitus by analyzing the factors that affect the diet quality among the Spanish adult population in North Africa. The research findings indicate that various sociodemographic factors, such as region, religion, occupation, and education level, have an impact on the quality of diet.
This study introduces an analysis for determining factors of diet quality among the Spanish adult population in North Africa with the aim of promoting healthier eating habits to prevent the development of diabetes mellitus. It is a diagnostic, non-experimental, cross-sectional and observational study, with a descriptive correlational methodology, with 201 participants from Ceuta and Melilla. The information collection has been carried out through the 24 h diet recall. Various sociodemographic factors influencing the quality of the diet have been analyzed. People from Melilla adopt a carbohydrate-rich diet (p = 0.004), whereas people from Ceuta have a lipid-rich diet (p = 0.002), particularly a high- monounsaturated-fat diet (p = 0.007). Muslims consume more sugar (p = 0.001) compared with Christians. Those working consume less carbohydrates (p = 0.13) than those not working. The latter consuming more fats (p = 0.39), and those with a higher education level show higher consumption of proteins (p = 0.001). The results of this study suggest that diet quality, in general, does not follow healthy recommendations established for the Spanish population, where the sugar consumption-diabetes relationship justifies the need for further research on Muslim population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available