4.7 Article

Olfactory and Gustatory Supra-Threshold Sensitivities Are Linked to Ad Libitum Snack Choice

Journal

FOODS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11060799

Keywords

sensitivity; discriminability; olfaction; gustation; food choice; snacking; obesity

Funding

  1. University of Otago, New Zealand
  2. Royal Society of New Zealand via Marsden Fund [UOO_1720]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individual sensitivities to sweet-associated stimuli were negatively correlated with the intake of congruent snacks and positively correlated with incongruent snacks. These differences were mainly reflected in energy intake, not consumption weight.
Snacking is a common eating habit in the modern food environment. Individual snack choices vary substantially, with sweet versus savoury snacks linked to differential health outcomes. The role of olfactory and gustatory sensitivities in snack choices and consumption is yet to be tested. A total of 70 Caucasian young males (age: 21-39 years; BMI: 20.5-40.5 kg.m(-2)) were tested for their supra-threshold sensitivities to sweet and savoury associated odours and tastants (vanillin, methional; sucrose, NaCl). The participants also attended an ad libitum task in which their intakes of sweet and savoury snacks were recorded and analysed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to test for relationships between odour/taste sensitivities and sweet versus savoury snack intake. Results indicated that individual sensitivities to sweet-associated stimuli (e.g., vanillin, sucrose) were negatively linked with intake of the congruent (e.g., sweet) snacks and positively linked with incongruent (e.g., savoury) snacks (p < 0.05). These differences were reflected by energy intake rather than consumption weight (p > 0.05). This study outlines the fundamental roles of olfactory and gustatory sensitivities in snack choices and offers novel insights into inter-individual variability in snack consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available