4.7 Article

Spirulina as Animal Feed: Opportunities and Challenges

Journal

FOODS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11070965

Keywords

microalgae; alternative protein source; animal nutrition; product quality; meat science; soybean meal replacement; fishmeal replacement

Funding

  1. Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture Germany [ZN 3261, ZN 3041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spirulina shows potential as a protein source in poultry and pork production, as well as aquaculture. However, using spirulina as a feed can have implications for system productivity and product quality, depending on the animal production system. Further research should focus on sustainability analysis and product processing and acceptance to investigate the trade-offs of incorporating spirulina into poultry and fish diets.
Increasing demand for protein, especially animal-based proteins and the large amounts of protein feed inputs required for production, has largely driven the research on spirulina as an animal feed. This short communication summarizes the results from two larger research projects investigating spirulina as an animal feed. Overall, spirulina appears to be a prospective protein source in poultry and pork production, as well as aquaculture. However, spirulina as a feed can have implications for system productivity and end product quality, depending on animal production system. Neither swine productivity nor product quality was negatively affected with spirulina as a feed, which is likely due to the low amounts of protein required in swine finishing diets. Spirulina as a feed does negatively affect poultry and fish productivity as well as alter product quality, primarily raw meat color. Therefore, future research focused on sustainability analysis and product processing and acceptance should investigate the trade-offs of incorporating spirulina into poultry and fish diets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available