4.7 Article

Cleaner Fish Labroides dimidiatus Presence Does Not Indirectly Affect Demersal Zooplankton

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.812989

Keywords

Pomacentridae; demersal zooplankton; mutualism; indirect effects; cleaning symbiosis; planktivorous fish; coral reef trophic ecology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coral reef mutualisms involve complex trophic ecological relationships that produce indirect effects. This study investigated the effects of removing mutualistic cleaner fish on planktivorous fish abundance and diversity, as well as demersal zooplankton biomass, abundance, and diversity. The results showed that the removal of cleaner fish had a limited impact on planktivorous fish and had no detectable indirect effects on non-gnathiid zooplankton. Nevertheless, diel and temporal changes in zooplankton likely influence coral reef trophic interactions.
Coral reef mutualisms involve complex trophic ecological relationships that produce indirect effects. Excluding mutualistic cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus from reefs indirectly increases the abundance of many fishes and reduces demersal stages of their ectoparasitic prey (gnathiid isopods). Whether cleaners affect populations of planktivorous fishes that consume demersal zooplankton, and consequently indirectly affect the rest of the demersal zooplankton community - via presumed changes in planktivory - is unknown. Therefore, using a long-term cleaner fish manipulation on patch reefs (July 2000 to December 2012, Great Barrier Reef), we tested whether cleaner treatment (removal or control) affects planktivorous fish abundance and diversity, and demersal zooplankton biomass, abundance, and diversity. Fish surveys, 9 and 12 years after removing cleaners revealed fewer fish on removal compared to control reefs for one of the three most abundant planktivores, but not total abundance (Pomacentridae, 26 species), diversity, and composition. Emerging zooplankton were sampled during the day and night over nine sampling trips across 12 years. There was no effect of cleaner treatment on post-removal values, compared with pre-removal values in July 2000, for zooplankton biomass, abundance, diversity, and composition (34 taxa). Zooplankton abundance showed no diel differences, but diversity, and occasionally biomass, were higher at night. Zooplankton composition also showed diel differences, with three taxa contributing the most to this dissimilarity [Cirripeda nauplii, Facetotecta (Arthopoda), Oikopleuridae (Chordata)]. Zooplankton diversity did not differ among times, abundance was higher in January 2002 relative to July 2000, and composition differed among all times. The lack of detectable indirect effects of cleaner fish presence on zooplankton (non-gnathiid) may partly be due to cleaners' variable effect on planktivorous fish abundance, but also the result of invertebrate planktivory and other processes that affect zooplankton populations not investigated here. Nevertheless, the pronounced diel and temporal changes in zooplankton observed likely influence coral reef trophic interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available