4.7 Article

Sea Ice and Substratum Shape Extensive Kelp Forests in the Canadian Arctic

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.754074

Keywords

macroalgae; polar; borealization; marine forests; seaweed; sea ice

Funding

  1. ArcticNet through the ArcticKelp project [P101]
  2. Fisheries and Oceans Canada Arctic Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
  3. Arctic Science and Aquatic Invasive Species Monitoring and Research Funds
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  5. NRCan Polar Continental Shelf Program Support
  6. Canadian Aquatic Invasive Species Network (CAISN)
  7. Nunavut Marine Region Wildlife Management Board (NWMB)
  8. Nunavut Fisheries Association
  9. Cumberland Sound Fisheries Ltd
  10. Centre for Fisheries Ecosystems Research
  11. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Oceans North
  12. Institute of Marine Research, Norway
  13. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [NSERC-PDF 516938-2018]
  14. Australian Research Council [DE1901006192]
  15. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1906726]
  16. Marine Environmental Observation, Prediction and Response Network
  17. Network of Centres of Excellence
  18. Polar Knowledge Canada
  19. Southampton Island Marine Ecosystem Project (SIMEP)
  20. Belmont Forum/BiodivERsA
  21. marine biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (ACCES) project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coastal zone of the Canadian Arctic represents 10% of the world's coastline and is one of the most rapidly changing marine regions on the planet. This study found that kelp forests are abundant and cover a significant portion of the seafloor in the Eastern Canadian Arctic, despite the presence of thick sea ice and scarce hard substrata in some areas. The abundance and diversity of seaweeds in this region are influenced by sea ice cover, substratum type, and nutrient availability.
The coastal zone of the Canadian Arctic represents 10% of the world's coastline and is one of the most rapidly changing marine regions on the planet. To predict the consequences of these environmental changes, a better understanding of how environmental gradients shape coastal habitat structure in this area is required. We quantified the abundance and diversity of canopy forming seaweeds throughout the nearshore zone (5-15 m) of the Eastern Canadian Arctic using diving surveys and benthic collections at 55 sites distributed over 3,000 km of coastline. Kelp forests were found throughout, covering on average 40.4% (+/- 29.9 SD) of the seafloor across all sites and depths, despite thick sea ice and scarce hard substrata in some areas. Total standing macroalgal biomass ranged from 0 to 32 kg m(-2) wet weight and averaged 3.7 kg m(-2) (+/- 0.6 SD) across all sites and depths. Kelps were less abundant at depths of 5 m compared to 10 or 15 m and distinct regional assemblages were related to sea ice cover, substratum type, and nutrient availability. The most common community configuration was a mixed assemblage of four species: Agarum clathratum (14.9% benthic cover +/- 12.0 SD), Saccharina latissima (13% +/- 14.7 SD), Alaria esculenta (5.4% +/- 1.2 SD), and Laminaria solidungula (3.7% +/- 4.9 SD). A. clathratum dominated northernmost regions and S. latissima and L. solidungula occurred at high abundance in regions with more open water days. In southeastern areas along the coast of northern Labrador, the coastal zone was mainly sea urchin barrens, with little vegetation. We found positive relationships between open water days (days without sea ice) and kelp biomass and seaweed diversity, suggesting kelp biomass could increase, and the species composition of kelp forests could shift, as sea ice diminishes in some areas of the Eastern Canadian Arctic. Our findings demonstrate the high potential productivity of this extensive coastal zone and highlight the need to better understand the ecology of this system and the services it provides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available