4.7 Article

Oil Spill and Socioeconomic Vulnerability in Marine Protected Areas

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.859697

Keywords

vulnerability indicators; ocean economy; oil spill; socioeconomic factors; marine protected areas

Funding

  1. consortium of the National Institutes of Science and Technology for the Tropical Marine Environment (INCT-AmbTropic )
  2. National Institute of Science and Technology Integrated Center of Oceanography (INCT-Mar-COI)
  3. National Institute of Science and Technology for the Integrated Studies of Oceanographic Studies from the Shelf to the Slope (INCT PRO-OCEANO)
  4. CNPq
  5. Long Term Ecological Research Programs Costa dos Corais Alagoas (PELD-CCAL )
  6. Brazilian Semiarid Coast
  7. Tamandare Sustentavel
  8. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation of the Brazilian Government
  9. Alexander Von Humboldt Foundation
  10. FUNCAP (Chief-Scientist Program)
  11. CAPES [CNPq 565054/2010-4, FAPESB 8936/201]
  12. Research Council of Norway [CNPq 610012/2011-8]
  13. Belmont Forum
  14. BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme [565061/2010-0, 311038/2017-4, 316797/2021-9, 301515/2019-0, 310464/2020-0, 441657/20168, 442337/2020-5, 441632/2016-5]
  15. French National Research Agency (ANR) [CNPq 311449/2019-0]
  16. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [311785/2018-2]
  17. National Science Foundation (NSF) [313518/2020-3]
  18. Research Council of Norway (RCN)
  19. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  20. Anima Institute (AI)
  21. Institutional Postdoctoral Program from the Graduate Program in Ecology at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPGE-UFRJ)
  22. [295650]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the socioeconomic vulnerability of human communities in Brazilian MPAs affected by a major oil spill in the southwestern Atlantic. The findings revealed a high vulnerability of these protected areas to oil accidents, particularly impacting food security for traditional communities.
The extensive oil spill (> 2,900 km) that occurred in the southwestern Atlantic (2019/2020) increased the vulnerability of the Brazilian coast, affecting marine and coastal protected areas (MPAs). In addition to supporting conservation, MPAs are sustainably used by local populations to help maintain ocean-dependent livelihoods. In this sense, we aim to assess the socioeconomic vulnerability of human communities in MPAs affected by this major oil spill. Using digital mapping, we assessed the socioeconomic vulnerability of 68 human communities living in or near 60 MPAs of different categories that were impacted by this spill. This is the first assessment of the vulnerability status of human populations under significant levels of poverty and social inequality, which are particularly dependent on healthy and effective Brazilian MPAs. More than 6,500 enterprises and institutions were mapped, including trade activities, services, tourism, and leisure venues. Most enterprises (34.4%) were involved in the food sector, related to the ocean economy, and, therefore, highly vulnerable to oil spills. Furthermore, the majority (79.3%) of the vulnerable activities are concentrated in multiple-use MPAs, with extractive reserves coming second and accounting for 18%. This result shows the high vulnerability of this tropical coast to oil accidents and the risks to food security for traditional communities. We also found a heterogeneous vulnerability indicator along the coast, with the most vulnerable regions having an undiversified economic matrix heavily dependent on activities such as fishing, family farming, tourism, accommodation, and the food sector. Thus, this study provides a tool to help prevent and mitigate economic losses and increases the understanding of the weaknesses of MPAs in the face of large-scale disasters, thus helping to build socioeconomic and ecological resilience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available