4.6 Article

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing to Investigate Infectious Endophthalmitis of Brucella: A Case Report

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.847143

Keywords

infectious endophthalmitis; high-throughput sequencing; brucella; ocular; metagenomic next-generation sequencing

Funding

  1. Qingmiao Project of Xuzhou First People's Hospital [QMHB2021026]
  2. Xuzhou Medical Outstanding Personnel Plan [XWJC001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports a case of ocular inflammation caused by Brucella, successfully diagnosed using mNGS technology. Despite the low incidence of Brucella in non-epidemic areas, it should still be considered as a possible pathogen. mNGS technology can aid in early diagnosis and treatment of difficult-to-diagnose ocular infections.
IntroductionBrucellosis is a systemic disease that exists prevalently in clinical manifestations. The symptoms present in organs such as the eyes (in ocular brucellosis) can lead to misdiagnosis or even failure to diagnose. Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), a high-throughput sequencing approach, could be applied for the detection of microorganisms. Case PresentationA 57-year-old female with acute right-eye vision loss, treated with clindamycin and dexamethasone sodium phosphate for 1.5 months, was difficult to diagnose using regular methods. mNGS was utilized for the aqueous fluid from the patient, and Brucella melitensis was identified. The inflammation was treated with 3 months of antibiotherapy. However, even with specific medicine and surgery, the vision remained poor because severe ocular conditions last for a long time. ConclusionIt suggests that brucella should still be a probable pathogen in endophthalmitis despite its low incidence in non-epidemic areas. Moreover, mNGS can achieve early diagnosis and timely treatment for difficult-to-diagnose ocular infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available