4.6 Article

Application of Machine Learning Solutions to Optimize Parameter Prediction to Enhance Automatic NMR Metabolite Profiling

Journal

METABOLITES
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12040283

Keywords

automatic profiling; NMR; machine learning

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [RTI2018-096061-B-100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quality of automatic metabolite profiling in NMR datasets from complex matrices can be affected by various sources of variability and low-intensity signals. This study demonstrates that by optimizing the analysis and modeling of signal parameters, better profiling quality indicators can be obtained, maximizing the performance of automatic profiling.
The quality of automatic metabolite profiling in NMR datasets from complex matrices can be affected by the numerous sources of variability. These sources, as well as the presence of multiple low-intensity signals, cause uncertainty in the metabolite signal parameters. Lineshape fitting approaches often produce suboptimal resolutions to adapt them in a complex spectrum lineshape. As a result, the use of software tools for automatic profiling tends to be restricted to specific biological matrices and/or sample preparation protocols to obtain reliable results. However, the analysis and modelling of the signal parameters collected during initial iteration can be further optimized to reduce uncertainty by generating narrow and accurate predictions of the expected signal parameters. In this study, we show that, thanks to the predictions generated, better profiling quality indicators can be outputted, and the performance of automatic profiling can be maximized. Our proposed workflow can learn and model the sample properties; therefore, restrictions in the biological matrix, or sample preparation protocol, and limitations of lineshape fitting approaches can be overcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available