Journal
PATHOGENS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11030320
Keywords
African swine fever virus; disinfectant; modified vaccinia virus Ankara; surrogate virus; virucidal efficacy
Categories
Funding
- Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Republic of Korea [I-1543073-2020-22]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In South Korea, efficacy-tested, virus-specific disinfectants are allowed for use in the veterinary industry. However, domestic testing of disinfectants against foreign and contagious livestock diseases is legally restricted. To address this issue, the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA) conducted a study to find a potential surrogate for African swine fever virus (ASFV) for efficacy testing of disinfectants. They compared the modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) to ASFV in terms of their susceptibility to disinfectants. The study found that the disinfectants are effective against MVA at similar or higher concentrations than those against ASFV, validating the use of MVA as a potential surrogate for ASFV in efficacy testing.
In South Korea, despite the increase in emerging viral pathogens in the veterinary industry, only efficacy-tested, virus-specific disinfectants are allowed to be used. Moreover, domestic testing of disinfectants for their virucidal efficacies against foreign, malignant, infectious pathogens that are unreported within the country and/or contagious livestock diseases that require special attention regarding public hygiene are legally restricted. Therefore, the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA) designed a study to select a potential biosafety level 2 surrogate of African swine fever virus (ASFV) for efficacy testing to improve the disinfectant approval procedures. For this, the modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) was compared to ASFV in terms of its susceptibility to disinfectants. Effective concentrations of active substances of disinfectants (potassium peroxymonosulfate, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, malic acid, citric acid, glutaraldehyde, and benzalkonium chloride) against ASFV and MVA were compared; similarly, efficacies of APQA-listed commercial disinfectants were examined. Tests were performed according to APQA guidelines, and infectivities of ASFV and MVA were confirmed by hemadsorption and cytopathic effect, respectively. The results reveal that the disinfectants are effective against MVA at similar or higher concentrations than those against ASFV, validating the use of MVA as a potential biosafety level 2 surrogate for ASFV in efficacy testing of veterinary disinfectants.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available