4.4 Article

The cost burden of problematic internet usage

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101107

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [FOR2974, 411232260]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing number of scientists are investigating the potential negative side effects of digital technology, particularly problematic usage. This paper examines what we currently know about the costs arising from problem use of digital technology. It is evident that problem use is associated with mental and physical health issues, impaired social functioning, decreased productivity, disrupted brain development, and unsafe use leading to accidents. This poses a significant burden on individuals and society as a whole. However, due to the broad range of conditions related to digital technology use and inadequate data, the exact costs are still unclear. A comprehensive approach for assessing the cost burden of problem use of digital technology is outlined in this paper, along with the methodological requirements.
A growing number of scientists investigate possible negative side-effects of digital technology. Problematic usage of the use. The present paper scrutinizes what we actually know about the costs arising from PUI. It becomes apparent that PUI is related to mental and physical health, social functioning, productivity loss, brain development, and unsafe use associated with accidents. This results in significant burden for a growing number of persons afflicted and also economically for society. Currently, it is unclear how much costs exactly arise due to the broad conditions related to digital technology use and insufficient data. A comprehensive approach on assessing the cost burden of PUI is outlined and methodological requirements are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available