4.7 Article

Improved dynamic modelling of DFIG driven wind turbine with algorithm for optimal sharing of reactive power between converters

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.101961

Keywords

DFIG; Field Oriented Control(FOC); RSC control; Reactive Power Sharing; Loss reduction; Wind turbine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a dynamic modeling method for Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG), considering the electromotive force model of the stator-rotor circuit. The Converter control of DFIG is designed to reduce losses and achieve maximum power control. By controlling the active and reactive components of rotor currents, the copper losses of the rotor winding are effectively reduced, resulting in an efficient system.
In this paper, dynamic modelling of Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) considering the stator-rotor circuit electromotive force model is developed to compensate for the voltage drop and ensure ease in the calculation. Converter control of DFIG is designed to share reactive power at lower than rated wind speeds, effectively reducing rotor winding copper losses. Loss reduction and maximum power control are achieved by adequately controlling active and reactive components of rotor currents through the Rotor Side Converter (RSC) control for an efficient system. Control strategies for decreasing DFIG losses are described in this article. The stator power factor is offered to determine DFIG's reactive power support by rotor and grid side converters. At any wind speed, the reactive power-sharing ratio for converters is estimated to reduce machine copper losses. The optimum source of the reactive power depends on the relative loss consideration in the machine. However, this reactive power-sharing approach enhances system efficiency. To test the suggested formulation and examine the grid-interactive DFIG fed wind turbine performance for the controlling techniques, a Matlab/Simulink model of a 2.5 MW wind turbine is developed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available