4.7 Article

State of charge estimation at different temperatures based on dynamic thermal model for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104011

Keywords

Lithium battery; SOC estimation; Dynamic thermal model; Extended Kalman filter; Thermal effect; Wide temperature range

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an improved thermal model for lithium batteries is proposed, and the model parameters are identified using the least-squares method. The results show that temperature is an important factor in the model, and the proposed SOC estimation method has better capability in handling temperature variation.
In the existing modeling and state of charge (SOC) estimation of lithium batteries, the effect of ambient temperature is often ignored, which brings large errors to the model parameter identification, so the battery modeling and SOC estimation under temperature variation are performed. In this paper, an improved dual polarized dynamic thermal model is proposed, firstly, the thermal effect of lithium battery is analyzed, and the model parameters adopt the dynamic values of coupling temperature and SOC, and the model is improved in terms of both heat generation mechanism and heat transfer characteristics; then the model parameters are identified based on the least-squares method with variable forgetting factor (VFF-RLS). Finally, the SOC at different temperatures is evaluated based on the dynamic thermal model combined with the extended Kalman filtering (EKF) with nonlinear filtering capability. The results show that the temperature factor is an important and non-negligible influence factor in modeling, the proposed battery model in this paper has high computational accuracy, and the proposed SOC estimation method has better SOC estimation capability for the temperature variation problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available