4.7 Article

Charge-discharge-induced local strain distributions in a lithium amide-borohydride-iodide [LiBH4-LiNH2-LiI] solid electrolyte

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103600

Keywords

Lithium-Air Battery; All-Solid-State Batteries Solid-State Electrolytes; Lithium Amide-Borohydride-Iodide; Spatial and Temporal Strain Distributions

Categories

Funding

  1. Pan African Materials Institute under World Bank African Centers of Excellence Program [AUST/PAMI/2015 5415-NG]
  2. Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All-solid-state batteries based on solid-state electrolytes have high capacity and relative safety. However, the heterogeneous nature of the electrolyte can lead to spatial and temporal variations in strain distributions, and charging and discharging processes may cause failure of the solid electrolyte.
All-solid-state batteries based on solid-state electrolytes (SSE) have attracted considerable attention due to their high capacity and relative safety, compared to conventional batteries based on liquid electrolytes. As ions migrate from the electrodes through solid electrolytes (during charge and discharge cycles of an all-solid-state battery), they exert strains of varying proportions that are distributed across the electrolytes. Here, we show that, for an all-solid-state lithium-oxygen battery based on the SSE lithium amide-borohydride-iodide (LiBH4- LiNH2-LiI), the heterogeneous nature of the electrolyte leads to spatial and temporal variations in the induced strain distributions. The strains associated with discharging are much greater than those induced during charging. These results suggest that charging and discharging processes lead to local strain build-up and possible failure of solid electrolytes. The implications of the results are also discussed for the development of robust -solidstate batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available