Journal
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103660
Keywords
LSTM; Li-ion; SOC; Machine learning; Electric vehicles; Battery
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compares the performance of recurrent and non-recurrent neural networks in estimating battery state of charge, and finds that a non-recurrent feedforward neural network with filtered inputs has higher accuracy, requires less training time, and executes faster.
Battery state of charge estimation is critical for determining the remaining range of electrified vehicles and the runtime of battery-powered equipment. Neural network algorithms which learn the relation between battery measurements and state of charge are a promising alternative to estimators based on models with adaptive filters. In this work, two types of neural networks are studied: recurrent networks, which have inherent memory of the past, and non-recurrent networks, which can effectively have memory added through exogenous filtered inputs. An extensive and comprehensive study is performed for these network types, with learnable parameters ranging from 20 to 3000. Network performance is compared for two different battery types, multiple temperatures, drive cycles, and training repetitions. Compared to a recurrent neural network, a non-recurrent feedforward neural network with filtered inputs is found to be up to 23% more accurate, require less training time (76% less using a CPU and 60% less using a GPU), and execute in about 1/3 the amount of time on an NXP S32K142 microprocessor.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available