4.7 Review

Review on nanocellulose-based materials for supercapacitors applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103938

Keywords

Nanocellulose; Supercapacitors; Electrodes; Separators; Electrolytes; Supercapacitor performance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This comprehensive review summarizes recent research findings on the development of Nano Cellulose (NC)-based materials for supercapacitor applications. The types and synthesis methods of NC, as well as the NC-based electrodes, separators, and electrolytes, are briefly introduced. The paper also discusses the potential applications of NC in renewable energy storage devices and provides an outlook for future advancements in the field.
Energy storage and environmental protection are the major challenges of the 21st century, the world has to face. Extensive efforts have been made to develop Electrochemical Energy Storage (EES) devices like supercapacitors based on green and sustainable resources. In this consequence, Nano Cellulose (NC) has arisen up as a sustainable nanomaterial with its unique structure and properties, such as high specific modulus, excellent stability in most solvents, low toxicity, and natural abundance. Low cost and simple synthesis techniques further enables the NC as a promising alternative material for the fabrication of renewable energy storage devices. This comprehensive review summarizes recent research findings on the development of NC-based materials for supercapacitor ap-plications. The NC types and synthesis methods, and supercapacitor components are briefly introduced. Findings on NC-based electrodes, separators, and electrolytes as supercapacitor components are emphases of this review. Finally, the paper reviews the earlier reported works and puts forward outlooks on the further advance of NC in the field of EES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available