4.4 Review

Comparative Efficacy of Targeted Systemic Therapies for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis without Topical Corticosteroids: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Journal

DERMATOLOGY AND THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1181-1196

Publisher

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-022-00721-1

Keywords

Atopic dermatitis; EASI; IGA; Network meta-analysis; Pruritus NRS; Systematic literature review

Categories

Funding

  1. AbbVie Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) using a network meta-analysis. The results suggest that daily doses of 30 mg upadacitinib, 15 mg upadacitinib, and 200 mg abrocitinib may be the most efficacious treatment options for AD patients.
Introduction The comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not been systematically assessed using recent phase 3 data. This network meta-analysis assesses the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies without the addition of topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) in adults with moderate to severe AD. Methods The systematic literature review searched through 17 May 2021 for phase 3/4 trials with upadacitinib, interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-13 (IL-13), or JAK inhibitors compared with placebo or active intervention for adults and adolescents with moderate to severe AD with inadequate response to TCS/TCI or for whom TCS/TCI was medically inadvisable, without restrictions on year or region. Researchers assessed data using PRISMA guidelines. The proportion of patients achieving trial co-primary endpoints [Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) and reduction of >= 2 points from baseline; proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement >= 75% from baseline (EASI-75)]; EASI improvement >= 90% from baseline (EASI-90); and >= 4-point improvement on Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline (Delta NRS >= 4) were evaluated using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results Of 3415 initially identified records, network meta-analysis (NMA) ultimately included 6 records representing 9 unique studies. Two upadacitinib trials were also included. Eleven clinical trials including 6254 patients were analyzed. Upadacitinib 30 mg daily was the most efficacious therapy across all endpoints at the primary endpoint (week 12 or 16) and at earlier timepoints, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg daily and abrocitinib 200 mg daily. Discussion Many factors need to be considered for treatment selection for AD. These findings can help healthcare providers when personalizing a patient's treatment. Conclusion Upadacitinib 30 mg daily, upadacitinib 15 mg daily, and abrocitinib 200 mg daily may be the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies over 12-16 weeks of therapy in AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available