4.3 Article

Transcervical versus transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized and controlled trial protocol

Journal

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-1180

Keywords

Esophageal cancer; transcervical esophagectomy; transthoracic esophagectomy; laparo-gastroscopic esophagectomy (LGE); laparo-thoracoscopic esophagectomy (LTE)

Funding

  1. Shanghai Pujiang Program [2020PJD009, NSFC 81400681]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to compare the outcomes of two different surgical approaches (transcervical and transthoracic) for esophageal cancer resection through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The study will enroll patients over a 2-year period and collect perioperative and long-term outcome data, with a focus on perioperative morbidity as the primary endpoint.
Background: Anatomically, the esophagus is located within the mediastinum, and thus it potentially a transcervical approach for esophagectomy, which avoids thoracic manipulation, could be an alternative to transthoracic esophagectomy for the surgical resection of esophageal cancer. A modified transcervical minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), laparo-gastroscopic esophagectomy (LGE), was recently introduced using an integrated gastroscope to mobilize the esophagus. As such, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is necessary to validate its value compared to transthoracic MIE, which carries a high risk of morbidity due to thoracic manipulation. Methods: This prospective study plans to enroll patients with resectable esophageal cancer with a pathological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma patients over a 2-year period. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio: patients in Group A will radical LGE and patients in Group B will receive radical laparo-thoracoscopic esophagectomy (LTE). Perioperative and long-term outcomes of all patients will be collected and analyzed. The primary end point will be perioperative morbidity, and the secondary end points will include 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) and quality of life (QOL) score. Other data that will be collected and compared between the groups include the number of harvested lymph nodes, surgical Apgar score, and duration of operation. Discussion: Transthoracic MIE is the most widely accepted approach for treating esophageal cancer. In this RCT, transthoracic MIE and transcervical LGE will be compared with respect to oncological and surgical outcomes (oncological none-inferiority and surgical superiority).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available