4.7 Article

Advances in oil palm shell fibre reinforced thermoplastic and thermoset polymer composites

Journal

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 4945-4962

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.09.061

Keywords

Oil palm shell; Reinforcing filler; Thermoplastic; Thermoset

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researches have been dedicated to utilizing oil palm shell (OPS) as reinforcing filler in polymer composites and investigating its beneficial effects on enhancing composite properties. The characteristics of OPS, such as mechanical, thermal, water barrier, and biodegradability properties, are discussed. Challenges still exist in exploring the potentials and applications of OPS as a reinforcing filler.
Oil palm shell (OPS), one of the most abundantly produced solid bio-wastes in Southeast Asia, is yielded by crushing the oil palm kernel during palm oil extraction in the palm oil mills. Approaches have been devoted to developing the use of OPS as reinforcing filler in polymer composites to enhance the functional properties of composites. For OPS to be effective for reinforcing materials, its role and beneficial effects on the improvement of composites' properties need to be investigated. However, not many studies have discussed the potentials of incorporating OPS in thermoplastic and thermoset polymer composite applications. This paper summarises the enhancement of composite characteristics, including physical, mechanical, thermal, water barrier and biodegradability properties. Properties of OPS that make it a good candidate as a reinforcing filler, such as tensile strength, impact strength, elongation, Young's modulus, morphological and water absorption, are discussed in detail. In addition, the application of its derivative, challenges, and outlook are also discussed. (C) 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available