4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Life cycle energy and carbon emissions of essential oil extraction from Rosemary

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 291-297

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.063

Keywords

Carbon emissions; Life cycle; LCA; Primary energy; R. officinalis; Rosemary

Categories

Funding

  1. European Structural and Investment Funds (FEEI)
  2. European regional development fund (ERDF) through the Regional Operational Program North 2020 within the scope of mobilizing project, Portugal [Norte-01-0247-FEDER-024479]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [810764]
  4. Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy -LEPABE, Portugal - FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC), Portugal [UIDB/00511/2020]
  5. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) [DL 57/2016]
  6. Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (NORTE2020), through Fundo Social Europeu (FSE) [NORTE-06-3559-FSE-000107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the primary energy and carbon emissions of essential oil extraction from Rosemary in Portugal using the life cycle assessment method. The results showed that supercritical fluid extraction was the best method for fresh samples, while hydro-distillation was preferable for dried samples. Additionally, the study compared the energy consumption and carbon emissions for two different functional units.
The search for essential oils from aromatic plants has been growing worldwide due to its potential applications in the food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries. This work aims to evaluate the life cycle's primary energy and carbon emissions of essential oil extraction from Rosemary grown in Portugal, following the LCA methodology. Two different functional units, 1 g of aromatic extract and 1 g of alpha-pinene, were selected for the study. Life cycle inventory data were mainly obtained from lab scale experiments, comparing three essential oil extraction processes, based on hydro-distillation (HD), HD followed by lyophilization (L) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). Results show that for the fresh samples, SFE is the best extraction method, with 290 MJ and 15 kg CO2-eq of energy and carbon emissions per 1 g of aromatic extract, while for dried samples the HD is preferable, with respectively 166 MJ and 8 kg CO2-eq per 1 g of aromatic extract. On the other hand, for obtaining 1 g alpha-pinene the HD is the best method with 465 and 1398 MJ of energy and 23 and 69 kg CO2-eq of carbon emissions, for respectively the fresh and dried samples. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available