4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Life cycle energy of vehicles on lightweighting and alternative powertrain strategies-A review

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 241-247

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.037

Keywords

Automotive; Life cycle energy; Lightweight material; Powertrain; Primary energy; Vehicle

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [810764]
  2. regional European and development fund [POCI-010247-FEDER-046095]
  3. Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology -CIETI [UIDB/04730/2020]
  4. FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [LA/P/0045/2020, UIDB/00511/2020 UIDP/00511/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to compare the analysis results of different studies on the life cycle energy of vehicles, focusing on two popular improvement strategies: lightweight materials and alternative powertrain selection. The selection of lightweight materials is influenced by the end-of-life scenarios, while innovative powertrains sourced by renewable energy can significantly reduce the energy consumption of vehicles. Therefore, the benefits of both strategies should be studied together.
To improve vehicles environmental performance, different strategies have been explored namely to reduce the use stage energy. In order to avoid problem shifting, a life cycle perspective should be used to compare alternative solutions. This paper aims to compare existing studies focused on life cycle energy (LCE) of vehicles to analyze the impacts and benefits regarding two trending improvement strategies: lightweight materials and alternative powertrain selection. A Literature review was performed to systematize quantitatively the LCE results of different studies (e.g. presented among figures, tables, and literature text). The LCE results were compiled and normalized for the same driving distance, 200 000 km, per life cycle stage. Moreover, the study discusses research findings on the application of the two strategies to improve overall vehicles' LCE. As lightweight materials have generally higher embodied energy, the material selection is highly influenced by end-of-life scenarios. It was observed that carbon/glass fiber composites generally have the highest embodied energy, being a preferable option for vehicles that last longer driving distances. Innovative powertrains sourced by renewable energy sources, electric mixes, can significantly reduce vehicles' LCE use stage, counteracting the benefit of lightweight design. Thus, the benefit of both strategies should be studied together. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available