4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Thermogravimetric analysis of high-density cork granules using isoconversional methods

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 442-447

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.100

Keywords

Cork granule; Kinetic analysis; Pyrolysis; Thermogravimetric analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal [UID/EQU/04730/2019]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/EQU/04730/2019] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermogravimetric techniques were used to study the thermal degradation of high-density cork granules. The main components of cork degrade mainly between 220°C and 525°C, and lignin continues to decompose up to 900°C. Activation energies were calculated using two isoconversional methods, with values aligning with data from other lignocellulosic biomass.
In the present work thermogravimetric techniques were used to study the thermal degradation of high-density cork granules. Pyrolysis experiments were carried out for four heating ramps (10, 15, 20 and 25 degrees C.min(-1)), using nitrogen as the carrier gas. From the differential thermogravimetric (DTG) curves it was seen that degradation mainly occurs from 220 degrees C to 525 degrees C for the main components of cork (suberin, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose). It was also observed that for temperatures higher than 525 degrees C and up to 900 degrees C, lignin continued to decompose. Activation energies were calculated using the data obtained and the two isoconversional methods Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) and Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO). For the KAS method, and for degrees of conversion between 0.10 and 0.85, the activation energies varied between 232.2 and 353.0 kJ.mol(-1). Using the FWO method and for the same degrees of conversion, the activation energies were in the range of 230.0 to 346.6 kJ.mol(-1). These values agree with data provided by other authors, for different lignocellulosic biomass. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available