4.6 Article

Microbiological Survey of 47 Permanent Makeup Inks Available in the United States

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040820

Keywords

permanent makeup (PMU) ink; microbial contamination; bacteria

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study primarily focused on microbial contamination in permanent makeup (PMU) inks. Results showed that 9 out of 47 unopened PMU inks were contaminated with microorganisms. The identified bacteria belonged to 26 different species, including clinically relevant strains. The study also found dominance and a strong co-occurrence relation of spore-forming Bacillus spp. in these inks.
In two previous surveys, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified microbial contamination in 53 of 112 (47%) unopened tattoo inks and tattoo-ink-related products (e.g., diluents) from 15 manufacturers in the U.S. In this study, we primarily focused our microbiological survey on permanent makeup (PMU) inks. We conducted a survey of 47 unopened PMU inks from nine manufacturers and a comparative species-centric co-occurrence network (SCN) analysis using the survey results. Aerobic plate count and enrichment culture methods using the FDA's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 23 revealed that 9 (19%) inks out of 47, from five manufacturers, were contaminated with microorganisms. The level of microbial contamination was less than 250 CFU/g in eight inks and 980 CFU/g in one ink. We identified 26 bacteria that belong to nine genera and 21 species, including some clinically relevant species, such as Alloiococcus otitis, Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis, Kocuria rosea, and Pasteurella canis. Among the identified microorganisms, the SCN analysis revealed dominance and a strong co-occurrence relation of spore-forming extreme environment survivors, Bacillus spp., with close phylogenetic/phenotypic relationships. These results provide practical insights into the possible microbial contamination factors and positive selection pressure of PMU inks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available