4.6 Article

Impact of Phosphorylcholine Expression on the Adherence and Invasion of Streptococcus pyogenes to Epithelial Cells

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10030527

Keywords

phosphorylcholine; Streptococcus pyogenes; PAF-R; emm genotype

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [20K18258]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K18258] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the role of phosphorylcholine (PC) in cell adhesion and invasion of Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes). The results show a negative correlation between PC expression level and bacterial adherence and invasion in S. pyogenes.
Phosphorylcholine (PC) is a structural component of various pathogens and is involved in bacterial adhesion via the platelet-activating factor receptor (PAF-R). In this study, we investigated how PC expression affects cell adhesion and invasion of Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes). Eight clinical strains of S. pyogenes were cultured, and PC expression was measured using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Bacterial adherence and invasion were examined using Detroit 562 cells. An anti-PC-specific monoclonal antibody (TEPC-15) was used to inhibit bacterial PC, and a PAF-R antagonist (ABT-491) was used to inhibit cellular PAF-R. The emm gene was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction with the standard primers. The level of PC expressed on the S. pyogenes surfaces differed in each strain and differed even in the same emm genotype. Adherence assay experiments showed a significant negative correlation between TEPC-15 and ABT-491 inhibitory effects and PC expression in S. pyogenes. Similarly, intracellular invasion assay experiments showed a significant negative correlation between TEPC-15 and ABT-491 inhibitory effects and PC expression in S. pyogenes. This study suggests that S. pyogenes is involved in cell adhesion and invasion by PC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available