4.6 Article

Assembly and Comparison of Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis Genomes

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10061134

Keywords

tick-borne pathogens; Ixodes ricinus; Nanopore sequencing; rickettsiales; Anaplasmataceae

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [52200-30-07]
  2. Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sports
  3. NorthTick, European Union, European Regional Development Fund, in the North Sea Region Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the complete genomes of Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis derived from wildlife reservoir host tissues using advanced sequencing technologies. This approach offers an alternative to obtaining material from clinical cases and expensive bacterial isolation methods, expanding the potential for laboratory diagnostics. It also has implications for other difficult-to-culture tick-borne pathogens.
Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis is widely prevalent in I. ricinus across Europe and has been associated with human disease. However, diagnostic modalities are limited, and much is still unknown about its biology. Here, we present the first complete Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis genomes directly derived from wildlife reservoir host tissues, using both long- and short-read sequencing technologies. This pragmatic approach provides an alternative to obtaining sufficient material from clinical cases, a difficult task for emerging infectious diseases, and to expensive and challenging bacterial isolation and culture methods. Both genomes exhibit a larger chromosome than the currently available Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis genomes and expand the ability to find new targets for the development of supportive laboratory diagnostics in the future. Moreover, this method could be utilized for other tick-borne pathogens that are difficult to culture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available