4.6 Article

Real-Life Use of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for the Treatment of Bloodstream Infection Due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Neutropenic Hematologic Patients: a Matched Control Study (ZENITH Study)

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02292-21

Keywords

multidrug-resistant; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; bacteremia; bloodstream infection; neutropenia; hematologic malignancy; ceftolozane; tazobactam

Categories

Funding

  1. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Bloodstream Infections, Endocarditis and Sepsis (ESGBIES)
  2. ESCMID Study Group for Immunocompromised Hosts (ESGICH)
  3. Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases
  4. Rio Hortega program of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  5. NIH
  6. Merck
  7. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdireccion General de Redes y Centros de Investigacion Cooperativa, Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad
  8. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain [CB21/13/00009]
  9. MSD Investigator Initiated Studies Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the characteristics and outcomes of neutropenic hematologic patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). The results showed that treatment with C/T was associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and reduced 7-day and 30-day mortality rates in these patients.
We sought to assess the characteristics and outcomes of neutropenic hematologic patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bloodstream infection (BSI) treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). We conducted a multicenter, international, matched-cohort study of PA BSI episodes in neutropenic hematologic patients who received C/T. Controls were patients with PA BSI treated with other antibiotics. Risk factors for overall 7-day and 30-day case fatality rates were analyzed. We compared 44 cases with 88 controls. Overall, 91% of episodes were caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. An endogenous source was the most frequent BSI origin (35.6%), followed by pneumonia (25.8%). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. C/T was given empirically in 11 patients and as definitive therapy in 41 patients. Treatment with C/T was associated with less need for mechanical ventilation (13.6% versus 33.3%; P = 0.021) and reduced 7-day (6.8% versus 34.1%; P = 0.001) and 30-day (22.7% versus 48.9%; P = 0.005) mortality. In the multivariate analysis, pneumonia, profound neutropenia, and persistent BSI were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality, whereas lower mortality was found among patients treated with C/T (adjusted OR [aOR] of 0.19; confidence interval [CI] 95% of 0.07 to 0.55; P = 0.002). Therapy with C/T was associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and reduced 7-day and 30-day case fatality rates compared to alternative agents in neutropenic hematologic patients with PA BSI. IMPORTANCE Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of difficult to treat infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) in the general nonimmunocompromised population. However, the experience of this agent in immunosuppressed neutropenic patients is very limited. Our study is unique because it is focused on extremely immunosuppressed hematological patients with neutropenia and bloodstream infection (BSI) due to PA (mainly multidrug resistant [MDR]), a scenario which is often associated with very high mortality rates. In our study, we found that the use of C/T for the treatment of MDR PA BSI in hematological neutropenic patients was significantly associated with improved outcomes, and, in addition, it was found to be an independent risk factor associated with increased survival. To date, this is the largest series involving neutropenic hematologic patients with PA BSI treated with C/T. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of difficult to treat infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) in the general nonimmunocompromised population. However, the experience of this agent in immunosuppressed neutropenic patients is very limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available