Journal
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00684-22
Keywords
alphaherpesvirus; pseudorabies virus; herpes simplex virus type 1; superinfection exclusion; fluorescent protein; herpes simplex virus; virus entry
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health R21 Exploratory/Development Award Grants [R21AI139935, R21AI146952]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Most viruses utilize superinfection exclusion (SIE) to conserve resources and control population dynamics. This study provides new insights into how alphaherpesviruses limit sequential infection through the undercharacterized gD-independent SIE, which differs between PRV and HSV-1.
Most viruses utilize a form of superinfection exclusion to conserve resources and control population dynamics. gD-dependent superinfection exclusion in alphaherpesviruses is well documented. However, the undercharacterized gD-independent SIE provides new insight into how alphaherpesviruses limit sequential infection. Superinfection exclusion (SIE) is a phenomenon in which a primary viral infection interferes with secondary viral infections within that same cell. Although SIE has been observed across many viruses, it has remained relatively understudied. A recently characterized glycoprotein D (gD)-independent SIE of alphaherpesviruses presents a novel mechanism of coinfection restriction for herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and pseudorabies virus (PRV). In this study, we evaluated the role of multiplicity of infection (MOI), receptor expression, and trafficking of virions to gain greater insight into potential mechanisms of alphaherpesvirus SIE. We observed that high-MOI secondary viral infections were able to overcome SIE in a manner that was independent of receptor availability. We next assessed virion localization during SIE through live microscopy of fluorescently labeled virions and capsid assemblies. Analysis of these fluorescent assemblies identified changes in the distribution of capsids during SIE. These results indicate that SIE during PRV infection inhibits viral entry or fusion while HSV-1 SIE inhibits infection through a postentry mechanism. Although the timing and phenotype of SIE are similar between alphaherpesviruses, the related viruses implement different mechanisms to restrict coinfection. IMPORTANCE Most viruses utilize a form of superinfection exclusion to conserve resources and control population dynamics. gD-dependent superinfection exclusion in alphaherpesviruses is well documented. However, the undercharacterized gD-independent SIE provides new insight into how alphaherpesviruses limit sequential infection. The observations described here demonstrate that gD-independent SIE differs between PRV and HSV-1. Comparing these differences provides new insights into the underlying mechanisms of SIE implemented by two related viruses.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available