4.7 Article

Multicenter 18F-PI-2620 PET for In Vivo Braak Staging of Tau Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12030458

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Tau; PET; Braak staging; PI-2620

Funding

  1. University of Leipzig

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized the F-18-PI-2620 tracer and PET imaging to perform Tau Braak staging in patients with AD, and found that PET positivity closely followed the Braak staging scheme, allowing for the categorization of most cases into the six-stage hierarchical Braak model.
Tau aggregates accumulate in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain according to the established Braak staging scheme and spread from transentorhinal over limbic regions to the neocortex. To impact the management of AD patients, an in vivo tool for tau Braak staging is needed. First-generation tau tracers have limited performance in detecting early stages of tau. Therefore, we tested the corresponding capability of the next-generation tau tracer, F-18-PI-2620. We analyzed F-18-PI-2620 multicenter PET data from 37 beta-amyloid-positive AD dementia patients and those from 26 healthy controls. We applied kinetic modeling of the 0-60 min p.i. PET data using MRTM2 with the lower cerebellum as the reference region to extract Braak stage-dependent distribution volume ratios, whereas controls were used to define Braak stage PET positivity thresholds. Stage-dependent PET positivity widely followed the Braak scheme (except Braak stage III) presenting descending frequency of PET positivity from Braak I (43%), II (38%), III (49%), IV (35%), V (30%) to VI (14%). A strictly hierarchical model was met by 64% of AD dementia cases. Nineteen percent showed a hippocampal sparing tauopathy pattern. Thus, we could assign 87% to the six-stage hierarchical Braak model including tauopathy variants. F-18-PI-2620 PET appears to be able to perform Braak tau staging of AD in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available