4.7 Article

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody and T Cell Response after a Third Vaccine Dose in Hemodialysis Patients Compared with Healthy Controls

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050694

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; 3rd dose; hemodialysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hemodialysis (HD) patients have a higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, the impact of a third vaccine dose (3D) on antibody levels and T cell response in HD patients was assessed. The results showed that the 3D improved antibody and T cell response in most HD patients, although a subgroup of HD patients with diminished response after the first two doses still had lower levels compared to responders and controls.
Hemodialysis (HD) patients have an increased risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, we assess the impact of a third vaccine dose (3D) on antibody levels and T cell response in HD patients and a healthy control group in a prospective cohort study consisting of 60 HD patients and 65 healthy controls. Each participant received two doses of the BNT-162b2 mRNA vaccine and an mRNA vaccine 3D. The SARS-CoV-2 antibody response was measured 6 months after the second vaccine dose and 6 to 8 weeks after the 3D. We assessed INF-gamma secretion 6-8 weeks post 3D in 24 healthy controls, 17 HD patients with a normal response, and 20 low responder HD patients. The groups were compared using univariate quantile regressions and multiple analyses. After the 3D, the SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody and INF-gamma titers of most HD patients were comparable to those of healthy controls. A subgroup of HD patients who had shown a diminished antibody response after the first two vaccine doses developed a significantly lower antibody and INF-gamma response compared to responder HD patients and controls even after the 3D. A new strategy is needed to protect low/non-responder HD patients from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available