4.5 Review

Assessing adherence to inhaled therapies in asthma and the emergence of electronic monitoring devices

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW
Volume 31, Issue 164, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0271-2021

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infrequent use of inhaled corticosteroids and over-reliance of short-acting beta-agonists are recognized as key contributors to increased morbidity and mortality in asthma. Electronic monitoring devices have the potential to improve asthma care by accurately tracking medication use and providing feedback to patients. This is a significant step forward in asthma management.
Infrequent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and/or over-reliance of short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) are recognised as key contributors to increased morbidity and mortality in asthma. The most frequent measures of ICS adherence and SABA use rely on patient-reported questionnaires or prescription refill records, neither of which are considered sufficiently reliable. Technological advancements in the development of electronic monitoring of inhaler devices allow for monitoring of use, as well as recording of and feedback on inhaler technique for some devices. Most electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) are paired with a smartphone application, allowing patients to set reminders and display both preventer and reliever use over time. This allows identification of intentional and unintentional ICS non-adherence as well as frequency of SABA use. This information assists clinicians in distinguishing difficult-to-control from severe asthma. Although additional evidence is required to assess the impact of EMDs on clinical outcome measures such as exacerbation rate, the introduction of EMDs into the asthma armoury is a significant step forward in asthma care with the potential to improve asthma-related outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available